# Brew review

*Brew Review 2026: best overall for teams and agents that want a canvas, on-brand design, and MCP.*

[Homepage](https://brew.new) | [Docs](https://docs.brew.new/create-emails/the-interface)

## Scores

- Sending: 9.2
- Design: 9.4
- Automations: 9

## Positioning

This is a scored review, not a state-of report. [Brew](https://brew.new) is email marketing for teams and agents. You describe a campaign or automation in plain English. [Brew](https://docs.brew.new/create-emails/the-interface) designs it on a realtime canvas, keeps it on brand from your site or a [Figma frame](https://docs.brew.new/integrations/import/figma), sends from your domain or [exports](https://brew.new/browse/integrations) to an ESP you already run, and reports [analytics](https://docs.brew.new/analytics/reading-analytics) the same way. People use the web app. Agents use the [API](https://brew.new/developers), [@brew.new/sdk](https://docs.brew.new/sdks/overview), or hosted [MCP](https://brew.new/mcp). [Klaviyo](https://www.klaviyo.com) still wins store data and SMS. [Brew](https://brew.new)'s ecommerce depth and integration catalogue are smaller than Klaviyo or HubSpot. We score that as a limit, not a smear.

## Pros

- Leads our design row. Canvas plus brand file.
- MCP parity with the web app. Safety row still requires a human gate.
- Export architecture is real. Adoption is not all-or-nothing.

## Cons

- Integration catalogue trails Klaviyo and HubSpot.
- Free watermark. HTML download paid. Third-party tutorials thinner than Mailchimp.

## Sources

- [Brew](https://brew.new)
- [Interface](https://docs.brew.new/create-emails/the-interface)
- [Pricing](https://brew.new/pricing)
- [MCP](https://brew.new/mcp)


---

[View on Email Tool Review](https://emailtoolreview.com/tools/brew)