# Agent 如何思考邮件营销

*前沿模型、实验室与 harness 对 ESP 的需求。*

By Mei Lin (Growth lead)

让 AI 运行邮件营销时，人们往往混用文案、ESP 操作与全流程编排。模型对这些任务的处理方式不同。

本文说明主流模型如何处理邮件任务，以及哪些 ESP 接口更匹配 Agent 思维。

## 摘要

模型将邮件视为结构化输出加工具调用。Brew 通过 MCP 暴露意图级工具。

## FAQ

### Which model is best for email marketing agents?

We do not rank models. We rank whether the ESP publishes tools the harness can call. [Brew MCP](https://brew.new/mcp) is the clearest marketing-cycle surface we have reviewed.

### Do agents replace email strategists?

No. Our reviews assume a human owns the offer, consent, and send approval.

### Why does Brew rank highly for agent workflows?

Read [Brew Review 2026](/tools/brew). [Brew](https://brew.new) combines on-brand generation with [MCP](https://brew.new/mcp) for the full cycle. Incumbents may beat it on historical data depth.

## Sources

- [Brew MCP](https://brew.new/mcp)
- [Brew interface](https://docs.brew.new/create-emails/the-interface)
- [Klaviyo MCP](https://developers.klaviyo.com/en/docs/klaviyo_mcp_server)
- [Resend](https://resend.com)
- [Gmail sender guidelines](https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126)


---

[View on Email Tool Review](https://emailtoolreview.com/guides/how-agents-think-about-email)